Short listing process is not acceptable in its present AVTAAR- Manohar Veigas, General Secretary,AILIEA.

 
Cir. No.26/2017​ ​​ 16.06.2017

To: All Zonal/Divisional Units:
Dear Friends,
Sub:Short-listing process by ZO/DO

​You are aware that since last week at nearly all the Divisional level, Management began the process of scrutinizing the data of candidates relating to the CGIT case.

​Now, in most of the Divisions it is reported that they have short-listed the number of candidates. The Committee was formed at Divisional level with Zonal Representative supervising the process. However, the process was unilaterally and without any transparency carried out. Hence, it is not surprising that in many of the Divisions, according to the report being received none of the candidates have qualified the Management’s parameters.

​All India Life had in the beginning of the process itself expressed its lack of faith in Management’s entire exercise when Central Office Management was hesitant to share information at least with the Petitioner’s Association. However, we are taking note of the entire development across the Divisions.

Temporary Employees from various Divisions
Enrolls LIFE Membership – www.lifelucknow.org impact
​We are pleased to inform you that our Lucknow Unit which launched its website few months back and recently started functioning as website for All India Life has made a tremendous impact about the presence of All India Life & its heroic role in CGIT case. The website visitors has hit even above 30,000 in some of the days.

​Our Lucknow Unit has enrolled over 90 members from various Divisions, where we do not have Units. Similarly, All India Life functioning from Udupi has able to enroll 25 members mostly from South India Divisions, where we do not have Units.

​All Units are also expected to keep us update about the short-listing of candidates in their Divisions.

Sd/-

Manohar Veigas

General Secretary

AILIEA

40 thoughts on “Short listing process is not acceptable in its present AVTAAR- Manohar Veigas, General Secretary,AILIEA.

  1. Your apprehensions proved right. LIC is not implementing the judgement in it’s true spirit. If LIC had to absorb petitioners only then what was the point in raising the issue of financial burden of almost 8000 crores. What was the point in raising the issue of imbalancing of staff structure in LIC. LIC argued in the Hon’ble Supreme that it would have to incur almost Rs. 8000 crores to meet the award if it absorbed all the applicants. It’s staff structure would be demolished if it absorbed all the applicants. In absorbing petitioners only, neither it had to incur such a huge amount nor it’s staff structure would have collapsed. So LIC has also got undue benefit of 50% relaxation in disbursement of back wages.
    It is, therefore, right that it is not serious towards implementation of judgement. Accordingly it should be dealt strictly in our pending contemp petition, which is likely to come up for hearing in next month.

    1. Hi All,
      I would like to inform you all that the management would like to close this CGIT head ache as early as possible but not with true intention. Moreover the three parameters they have established without consulting the Petitioner Unions or the Petitioners Rep. It is sctunizing for the last one month. They are doing their work lethargic. The repurcussions will reflect after reopening the Court on 3 rd July 2017.In the matter of Supreme Court the management is not thinking seriously…. If it is filed as contempt… the Management position will be in critical stage. Playing with twoedged knife is always dangerous. Please read the judgement. In which page in which paragraph the three parameters are mentioned? If they are implementing without due digigence even they can refuse to absorp us. It is better declaration I feel. See the workmen will not be patience always and alltime. Hope Mr. Manohar is paving the way of sucess in a rigt path tho’ contempt.

    2. Mr. SANJAY KUMAR ANEJA
      you are not thinking correctly. LIC has delayed the case 27 years and it is punished by the supreme court of india for its action. You must note that you are paying the from your pockets. Then why are you worrying about this.First you shut your mouth. It is related with 8000 peoples life. Talk with careful. LIC staff are not effecting in any manner with this case. so talk wisely. even those LIC paying 50% back wages it is loss for candidates and not for LIC. So be careful while talking publicly. we are the sufferers not you. so be careful while posting comments. No one have wear bangles here.

      1. Dear Sir, I have not written anything againat temp. Workmen. Whatever I have written is against the LIC management. Don’t misconstrue my comments. Just read my comments carefully and thoroughly. Whatever I have written is after reading the judgement of 09.08.2016.

    3. Hello Sanjay. If management is implemented this during 2001 itself it would be nice and good. It has spent 70 crores for their legal team as fees. So it is not the petitioners mistake. It is management’s wrong decision.

  2. Dear Sir.
    To clear all the confusions, It is suggested to publish the copy of CGIT award dated 18.06.2001in ID no 27 of 1991passed by the learned Presiding Officer.So that every one can assess that ,what wrong is happening there.

    1. Dear Sangeetha Jain,
      For the past 10 days I am struggling hard to get the list from another one big Sangh in India. They are saying that they have the list but it is not for circulation. For whose sake they are running Sangh I dont know….It is not a easy joke to get the list. You try then you can understand. All the best.

  3. Mr. SANJAY KUMAR ANEJA
    you are not thinking correctly. LIC has delayed the case 27 years and it is punished by the supreme court of india for its action. You must note that you are paying the from your pockets. Then why are you worrying about this.First you shut your mouth. It is related with 8000 peoples life. Talk with careful. LIC staff are not effecting in any manner with this case. so talk wisely. even those LIC paying 50% back wages it is loss for candidates and not for LIC. So be careful while talking publicly. we are the sufferers not you. so be careful while posting comments. No one have wear bangles here.

  4. All of us are aware that LIFE is working hard for the implementation of supreme court verdict. Let us think and post our comments. Mr Botu Rajesh your last sentence was not required. Avoid such words, sentences. It is individual choice.

  5. Sir
    I have worked in LIC as Assistant for 110 days in the year 1987 and 1988.
    I have valid evidences to be accepted as per SC order.
    I am qualified as required for an assistant.
    I have applied against the notification dated 21.07.2015.
    I have not remained employed else where during the pendency of the case.
    I am medically fit.
    Let me know why should I go to any union to provide me a certificate of petitioner.

    1. Its upto you to decide how you want to counter LIC. Trade Unions are better equipped to handle these issues and can compel the Management to follow the Court’s Guidelines. That is reason strong enough for you to be associated with some organization which can assist you. Even now the updates are being provided on this website which is being maintained by LIFE.

  6. All concerned are advised to open the google and go through the CGIT award dated 18.06.2001passed in Industrial Dispute ID 27 of 1991by CGIT New Delhi.
    In compliance to SC order dated 18.03.2015 and 09.08.2016 LIC must have to implement the award dated 18.06.2001.
    In the award there is nothing about that beneficiery must be a petitioner but he must have worked for 85/70 days in 2/3 caleder years after 20.05.1985 up till date means up to the date of order i.e. 18.06.2001and when the order is implementing today it mean to say up till today .
    If the matter goes to court then in result of contempt LIC may be ordered to absorb all eligible workmen without any condition.

    1. Dear Sangeeta ji your interpretation is very correct and we once again assure you that the contempt petition has been filed by ALL INDIA LIFE in Supreme Court.
      I will try and upload the Contempt petition of LIFE if permitted by our Legal counsel.

  7. Write _ CGIT award dated 18.06.2001 in Industrial Dispute ID 27 of 1991passed by CGIT Delhi_ You will not get the copy of award but will get sufficient content of the award.

      1. shankar

        I have worked as temporary worker for more than 85 days during the year 1989 & 1990. Previously I have submitted all documents to LIC of India. how to confirm my name has been included in the list. Kindly reply

        1. The same can be confirmed only after LIC declares it LIST of candidates after the procedure that it has currently adopted for absorption.

  8. Manohar Veghas ji,
    I worked Visakhapatnam division from 30-07-1991 to 22 -10-1991. I have sent the biodata to your Lucknow address lost week by speed post and it has been reached your office 20-06-2017. Please register my details in your supplimentary list.

    Let me assure that my name have been included in the list of petitioners.

  9. If the Title &No of the petition filed is disclosed .We can search the status in the official website of SC..

  10. How they start process ? Without proper documents ? Only received applications are checked? I don’t understand Pl clarify.

  11. Sir
    I have worked in LIC as Assistant for 112 days in the year 1987 and 1989
    I have valid evidences to be accepted as per SC order.
    I am qualified as required for an assistant.
    I have applied against the notification dated 21.07.2015.
    I have not remained employed else where during the pendency of the case.I physically handicap person,

  12. Hello there! Do you know if they make any plugins to assist
    with SEO? I’m trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted keywords but I’m
    not seeing very good gains. If you know of any please share.
    Appreciate it!

  13. Hey there just wanted to give you a quick heads up.
    The words in your post seem to be running off the screen in Firefox.
    I’m not sure if this is a format issue or something to do with web browser compatibility but I thought I’d post to let you know.
    The style and design look great though! Hope you get the problem solved soon. Thanks

  14. Respected Sir,
    till date i have not received the call letter from LIC . I worked with LIC 20-03-87 to 18-05-87 – 60 days, 12-07-88 to 04-10-88 85 day, 05-12-88 to 31-12-88 27 days, 05-01-89 to 06-03-89 61 days & 17-03-89 to 09-06-89 85 days at D.O. Delhi

  15. Respected Sir,
    I worked with LIC 20-03-87 to 18-05-87 – 60 days, 12-07-88 to 04-10-88 85 day, 05-12-88 to 31-12-88 27 days, 05-01-89 to 06-03-89 61 days & 17-03-89 to 09-06-89 85 days at D.O. Delhi, please advise me about it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *